Search Decisions

Decision Text

CG | DRB | 2013 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2013 003
Original file (2013 003.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DRB DIGEST/EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
DRB DOCKET 2013-003

CURRENT DD-214 Honorable, COMDTINST M1000.6, 12.B.12, JFV, Convenience of the Gov’t,
RE3G

BY DRB
CORRECTIONS

TIS 2yrs, 2months, 6 days
Policy Implications _| None

 

   

   
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

The applicant is asking for a change to RE-3P SPD code which falls under ‘physical disabilities’ that trigger a
transfer to the Temporary Disability Retirement List. The applicant has only provided a single report of a visit
to a Base clinic that limited any boat or sea duty for a two week period. Prior to the Spring 2006 clinic visit,
there is no other supporting evidence that the applicant had difficulty with motion sickness or seasickness in the
first 14 months on two separate CGC vessels.

The Board notes that the applicant’s DD-214 lists the Narrative Reason for Separation as Convenience of the
Gov't. Per ALCOAST 562/08, the use “Convenience of Government” is not considered as a narrative reason
from the Separation Program Designator handbook. Therefore, the DD-214 should be amended to list the
Narrative Reason for Separation as ‘Condition, Not a Disability’.

Board recommends no relief other than administrative change on the Narrative Reason for separation.

Propriety: Discharge was proper.

Equity: Discharge was equitable.

Final Adjudication by Assistant Commandant For Human Resources: No relief other than administrative
change on the Narrative Reason for separation listed above.

Similar Decisions

  • CG | DRB | 2012 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2012 060

    Original file (2012 060.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Thereafter, the applicant was formally evaluated each month on the progress to reach the desired performance expectations. Upon receiving notification of the discharge in 2008, the applicant objected to the discharge and was given an opportunity to speak on their behalf. Therefore, a separation summary may list the aforementioned Personnel Manual’s 12-B- 12 with Convenience of the Government in the Article/law or Separation Authority, but it is not to be substituted, or used synonymously...

  • CG | BCMR | Discharge and Reenlistment Codes | 2002-144

    Original file (2002-144.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    This final decision, dated July 24, 2003, is signed by the three duly appointed APPLICANT’S REQUEST AND ALLEGATIONS The applicant asked the Board to correct her military record by changing the narrative reason and reenlistment code on her discharge form (DD form 214). He stated that when the CO provided the applicant with notice and the opportunity to make a statement, he should have also advised the applicant that the nature of her “unsuitability” for military service was her...

  • CG | BCMR | Discharge and Reenlistment Codes | 2004-136

    Original file (2004-136.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    before the Coast Guard, and I have one now with the Michigan Army National Guard even after the Coast Guard. Although the applicant requested that his record be corrected to show he was discharged by reason of hardship, the Board agrees with the Coast Guard that no evidence exists in the record that the applicant ever requested a discharge by reason of hardship prior to his discharge from the Coast Guard. of the Personnel Manual and the JFX separation code support personality disorder...

  • CG | BCMR | Discharge and Reenlistment Codes | 2005-002

    Original file (2005-002.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    of the Coast Guard Medical Manual lists the personality disorders for which a member may be separated. As the Coast Guard stated, “Condition, Not a Disability” would be more appropriate in this case because the applicant was discharged due to an adjustment disorder, not a personality disorder. Given the applicant’s diagnosed adjustment disorder and the provisions of the SPD Handbook, the Coast Guard should have assigned her the JFV separation code for having a condition that precludes...

  • CG | BCMR | Discharge and Reenlistment Codes | 2005-143

    Original file (2005-143.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    On February 28, 1996, the applicant was discharged from the Coast Guard pursuant to Article 12.B.18.2 of the Coast Guard Personnel Manual. CGPC stated that the applicant’s discharge for physical standards as determined by the DRB is consistent with Coast Guard policy and that RE-4 is the appropriate reenlistment code given the applicant’s character of service. In light of the fact that the applicant’s record is devoid of anything derogatory and that the DRB changed the narrative reason for...

  • CG | DRB | 2012 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2012 063

    Original file (2012 063.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DRB DIGEST/EXECUTIVE SUMMARY DRB DOCKET 2012-063 CURRENT DD-214 Honorable, COMDTINST M1000.6, ART 12.B.12, KND, Separation for Miscellaneious/General Reasons, RE1 RELIEF REQUESTED | Change Narrative Reason to ‘Convenience of the Gov’t’ RELIEF GRANTED None BY DRB ADMIN None CORRECTIONS TIS 1 yr, 9 months, 15 days Policy Implications | None EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The applicant contends that the narrative reason on his DD-214 from 2010 is in error. Per ALCOAST 562/08, the use “Convenience of...

  • CG | DRB | 2013 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2013 073

    Original file (2013 073.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After receiving two documented alcohol incidents in the Fall of 2004, an administrative remarks entry was documented in which the applicant refused to attend outpatient rehabilitation treatment for Level II Alcohol Abuse. Discharge | No Change 25. Narrative Reason | No Change

  • CG | BCMR | Discharge and Reenlistment Codes | 2008-127

    Original file (2008-127.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    However, CGPC stated, the applicant was not diagnosed with a personality disorder, but with an adjustment disorder. of the Personnel Manual, and the separation code to JFV when the diagnosis of personality disorder was absent, uncertain, or not supported by inappropriate behavior.6 In this case, CGPC recommended that the Board correct the applicant’s DD 214 to show separation code JFV and Article 12.B.12. Accordingly, the applicant’s DD 214 should be corrected to show “Condition, Not a...

  • CG | BCMR | Discharge and Reenlistment Codes | 2011-075

    Original file (2011-075.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    On September 25, 2009, the Discharge Review Board (DRB) changed the applicant’s separation code from JNC to JFY (involuntary discharge due to adjustment disorder) and the narrative reason for his separation from “unacceptable conduct” to “adjustment disorder.” The applicant was diagnosed with an adjustment disorder while in the Coast Guard. The Board corrected that applicant’s record to show Article 12.B.12.a.12 of the Personnel Manual as the separation authority, JFV as his separation...

  • CG | DRB | 2014 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2014 048

    Original file (2014 048.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DRB DIGEST/EXECUTIVE SUMMARY DRB DOCKET 2014-048 CURRENT DD-214 Honorable, COMDTINST M1000.4, 1.B.12, JFV, Condition, not a disability, RE3G RE3G BY DRB CORRECTIONS TIS 0 yrs, 9 months, 0 days Policy Implications _| None EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The applicant was discharged for Condition, Not A Disability in 2012. The command processed the Discharge paperwork and it was effective after 9 months service. The Board finds no issues with propriety or equity in this case.